2011年考研英语一大作文范文(精选6篇)思维导图

这个判断要从三方面去理解。

首先看向考纲中的评分细则，官方考纲对于第五档（A节9－10分，B节17－20分）的评分标准要点：

考试大纲里规定了五个方面的评分细则，分别涵盖了"1.内容要点，2.语法和词汇， 3.语法错误， 4.衔接和层次， 5.格式和语域。"

可以看出细则1，3和5是属于基础要求，即不要跑题（细则1），没有错误（细则3），格式正确、语言得体（细则5），而细则4规定了衔接词的使用，即衔接词是明确得分点之一。和写作能力最相关的是第2条，"使用丰富的语法结构和词汇"，但是显然这一条讨论的仍然是语言的形式本身，丰富的语法结构包含什么呢，比如倒装句、非谓语动词、插入语、虚拟语气、强调句、并列句、被动语态、从句等等，也就是说阅卷老师并不十分关心大家在运用英文写作时内容是否逻辑严密、明确具体，而是更关心大家对语言的控制力。

这种重语言形式而轻内容的倾向，也和实际的阅卷过程息息相关。全国每年有几百万份试卷，一篇作文的评分时间是30-40秒，这就决定了在阅卷时没有时间成本去细究内容层面的逻辑是否严密连贯，论点是否新颖独到，只要没有明显的硬伤即可。

其次，考研英语作文的命制风格也与其评分标准相适应，究竟是先制定了作文评分标准再命题，还是先命制题目再制定评分标准，是一个先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题，已不得而知。但是可以明确的是作文题目命制风格和评分标准高度一致，下图是近五年的英语一作文真题。

近五年的考察的话题分别是"以身作则""实干""直面挑战的勇气""坚持""习惯（或时间管理）"。可以看出，都是一些较为抽象和宏大的品质，对比雅思写作题目，比如"很多人从乡村迁往城市，你从多大程度认为这是一个好的趋势？"，要完成这样一篇开放式作文，大部分同学能思考出相应中文观点就很不容易了，更不要说有相应的词伙积累（例如shortage of labour, job opportunities, improve living standards, consumer goods, public services等）来支撑自己完成论点的组织了。但是好在考研英语作文题目足够地抽象和宏大，不用去讨论太具体的事物，并不需要大量的知识储备，内容层面和思维难度要求比较低。

最后，从实际情况来说，真正具有英文写作能力的考生屈指可数，我和大家一样，从小到大学的都是中国式英语，深知我们的英语教学里对写作的忽视。命题专家肯定比我们更了解这个事实，如果用类似于雅思作文这种开放式作文题目来考察大家，就相当于用高中议论文题目去考察小学生，这样的结果就是考生上了考场现编，绝大多数作文都惨不忍睹，对于选拔性考试来说，这种结果显然是不可取的。

再者，既然是研究生入学考试，所考察的一定是作为一个准研究生应具备的能力，或者说通过考试引导大家提前培养该能力，直到我自己读研后才明白，95%的国内研究生在读研阶段根本不需要用英文写作，所以考研英语写作确实不用去考察真正意义上的英文写作能力。

那么，考研英语作文本质上究竟在考察什么？接着往下看。

How impressive the set of pictures are! In the first picture, the mother takes the daughter by the hand, while after thirty years the daughter hold her mother’s hand which is depicted in the second picture.

The meaning conveyed in the two pictures reveals that to respect the old and love the young is the traditional virtue and should be passed on from one generation to another. In real life, our parents not only give us life but do much in bringing us up. As the time goes on, they grow so physically weak that they no longer have the power to support themselves. So it is human nature for us to take our responsibility of taking care of them when they are old. Meanwhile, the virtue of willing to support the graying parents should be educated among Chinese people, no matter how young they are. It is necessary to drill the idea to the young all the time, so that they can better respect the older in future.

With love for the young, our society will be full of sunshine; with respect for the old, our country will be harmony and prosperous.

This picture shows a drastic change in the world’s commercial fishing. The two parts display totally different scenes in 1900 and 1995. In 1900, there were a large number of fish while only one boat was fishing on the ocean. But in 1995 fishing boats increased sharply while only one fish was left. The fish supplies have almost been exhausted by overfishing.

Judging from the picture, we can see that within about 100 years, humans have stripped the sea of her generous offerings. If we dont put an end to the trend, then the fish in the ocean could become extinct species in the foreseeable future.

Therefore, it is high time we took effective measures to solve this problem. First, we must bring world population under a reasonable control, as overfishing is largely due to the need to fill the additional mouths. Second, every year in the fishs mating season, a ^v^grace period^v^ should be enforced during which the fish are allowed to reproduce themselves. Third, strict laws should be implemented. Last but not least, we should enhance the awareness of the public that the ocean resources are very vital to us. Only when these above mentioned measures are put into practice can we save the fish from disappearing completely.

Suppose your class is to hold a charity sale for kids in need of help. Write your classmates an email to

1) inform them about the details, and

2) encourage them to participate.

You should write about 100 words on the ANSWER SHEET.

Do not use your own name. Use ^v^Li Ming^v^ instead.

Do not write your address. (10 points)

【范文】

【译文】

It has been said, "Not every thing that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?

"Experience is the best teacher" is an old cliché, but I agree with it. The most important, and sometimes the hardest, lessons we learn in life come from our participation in situations. You can’ learn everything from a book.

Of course, learning from books in a formal educational setting is also valuable. It’s in schools that we learn the information we need to function in our society. We learn how to speak and write and understand mathematical equations. This is all information that we need to live in our communities and earn a living.

Nevertheless, I think that the most important lessons can’t be taught; they have to be experienced. No one can teach us how to get along with others or how to have self-respect. As we grow from children into teenagers, no one can teach us how to deal with peer pressure. As we leave adolescence behind and enter adult life, no one can teach us how to fall in love and get married.

This shouldn’t stop us from looking for guidelines along the way. Teachers and parents are valuable sources of advice when we’re young. As we enter into new stages in our lives, the advice we receive from them is very helpful because they have already bad similar experiences. But experiencing our own triumphs and disasters is really the only way to learn how to deal with life.

For over a decade, the craze of Chinese college graduates taking qualifying examinations to become civil servants has remained unabated. An important proportion of graduates view civil service as their top priority in job selection and they spare no efforts in preparing for those examinations, sometimes years before their graduation.

To some extent, this craze is a modern revival of the ancient notion that "those who excel in academics end up in officialdom." In the present-day China, however, there are complicated reasons underlying this phenomenon. The jobs in sectors other than civil service are insecure and unstable, and employees have to work under greater stress faced with growing competitions in the workplace and the industry. Some government departments are related to monopolized industries and civil servants can enjoy unusually high salaries and welfare benefits. Finally, government officials are usually regarded as occupying the highest rung of the social hierarchy and a student who succeeds in becoming government official is considered the pride of the family, adding prestige and glory to the entire clan.

For all the apparent attractions of the officialdom, the craze of entering the civil service is a distorted one. In the United States, truly ambitious students enter the industry instead of civil departments, where they apply their individual initiative to achieve personal success. It has already been pointed out that, with so many best minds of the nation fighting their way into the civil sectors, the consequences are catastrophic. The civil servants system, with its inherent bureaucracy and rigid rules, would inevitably turn the otherwise energetic and aggressive young people into docile followers of their superiors’ instructions and dutiful but mediocre implementers of executive orders. This will considerably undermine the vitality of a whole generation and the competitiveness of the entire country in the international arena. All forms of craze are accompanied by elements of irrationality and abnormality and, the sooner this craze vanishes, the better.